Library  ·  Artifacts

Artifacts.

Diagrams, tables, and frames from the analytical work. Each artifact stands on its own and travels between decks, one-pagers, and conversations. Most also appear inside one or more library essays; those essay pages link back here.

16 artifacts, each on its own page with a downloadable SVG and cross-links back to the essays that cite it.

Decision-System Architecture — the four disciplines
Artifact

Decision-System Architecture — the four disciplines

The umbrella frame of the Analytic Bytes Library at a glance.

The Contract at the Seam
Artifact

The Contract at the Seam

Integration moves the data.

The Decision System — reference architecture
Artifact

The Decision System — reference architecture

A tool-agnostic reference architecture: sources through integration, warehouse, and the semantic-layer keystone to AI and the reporting surfaces, with a governance rail across every layer and a learning loop that closes the system.

One Architecture, Three Stacks
Artifact

One Architecture, Three Stacks

The same six-layer architecture instantiated three ways — Microsoft/Fabric, the modern data stack, and lean/open — showing the tools swap while the architecture holds.

The Agent System
Artifact

The Agent System

An agentic-AI architecture: five named agents — Data, Analysis, Insight, Execution, Monitoring — operating the Signal–Decision–Action loop, with monitoring closing the loop and a human-in-the-loop rail across every agent.

Decision Load vs Decision Capacity
Artifact

Decision Load vs Decision Capacity

AI raises both an organization's decision load and its decision capacity.

The Data Role Landscape
Artifact

The Data Role Landscape

Data-leadership roles distributed across the five stages of the decision arc — build the system, govern the system, interpret the signal, support the decision, own the decision.

Reliability vs Validity
Artifact

Reliability vs Validity

The four-target view of the AI scoring trap: a model can agree with human raters at a high rate (reliable) and still measure the wrong thing (invalid) — a tight cluster, off the bullseye.

The Validity Ladder
Artifact

The Validity Ladder

Five rungs of evidence for an AI system.

Fair for Whom?
Artifact

Fair for Whom?

Fairness reframed as validity asked one subgroup at a time.

The Evidence Spine
Artifact

The Evidence Spine

The measurement-and-evaluation architecture that turns monitoring into learning: a living theory of change as keystone, harmonized assessments, and one semantic layer so every audience sees numbers that agree.

Measurement = Diagnostics
Artifact

Measurement = Diagnostics

A sixteen-row translation table from educational measurement vocabulary to medical diagnostics — across foundations (validity, reliability), models (IRT and ROC, standard setting and thresholds, equating and calibration), bias and equity, stakes and decisions, standards and integrity, and the inferential closer: validity argument and differential diagnosis.

Higher Ed = Healthcare
Artifact

Higher Ed = Healthcare

An eighteen-row translation table mapping higher-education data and analytics vocabulary onto healthcare equivalents — across outcomes, throughput, advising and care navigation, support programs, infrastructure (SIS/EHR, NSC/HIE, 1EdTech/FHIR), regulation, accountability, equity, and integrative philosophy.

K-12 = Healthcare
Artifact

K-12 = Healthcare

An eighteen-row translation table mapping K-12 data and analytics vocabulary onto healthcare equivalents — across outcomes, intervention workflow, infrastructure, regulation, accountability, and integrative philosophy.

Commercial = Mission-Driven
Artifact

Commercial = Mission-Driven

A fourteen-term translation table from commercial vocabulary — GTM, audience, segmentation, funnel, conversion, KPIs, OKRs, ROI, LTV, runway, churn, A/B testing, MVP, CI/CD — to its mission-driven equivalents.

The essential minimum — mission-driven AI evaluation
Artifact

The essential minimum — mission-driven AI evaluation

Five components of one discipline: task decomposition, ground-truth benchmarking with constrained data, deployment-context evaluation, downstream impact evaluation, and escalation with human-in-the-loop discipline.